JONATHAN TURLEY: Jack Smith’s secret surveillance of Wiles and Patel is chilling abuse of power

Former Special Counsel Jack Smith long operated under Irish poet, playwright and novelist Oscar Wilde’s rule that “the only way to escape temptation is to give in to it.”

Over the past few months, the public has learned of a wide range of secret orders targeting members of Congress, Trump allies, and others. Now, the Trump administration has learned that F.B.D Cash Battle And the White House Smith also targeted Chief of Staff Susie Wiles in 2022 and 2023 when they were private citizens.

Smith’s selection as special counsel was controversial because of his history of aggressive legal arguments and tactics, including his unanimous loss before the Supreme Court in the case that overturned the convictions of his former defendants. Governor of Virginia Robert McDonnell.

And his tendency to stretch the law to its breaking point has not gone down well with juries in high-profile cases, including his case against former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards, who was accused of using campaign funds to hide an extramarital affair. That case ended in acquittal.

Despite these criticisms, Smith immediately returned to his previous pattern of casting aside any restraint or caution. Even Democrats earlier this year expressed objections to his targeting of Republican members of Congress, including the former Speaker of the House of Representatives. Kevin McCarthy.

Smith asked telecom companies not to tell members of Congress that their calls were being hijacked. Not only did these records expose potentially confidential sources, ranging from journalists to whistleblowers, but Smith’s gag order prevented Congress from responding to or challenging the allegedly offensive request.

GOP lawmaker accuses Jack Smith of “spying” on Congress in tense hearing on Trump investigation

Now, the Trump administration claims that Smith and the previous Biden administration effectively buried the targeting of Patel and Wells. It took the new Trump administration a year for these orders to be revealed.

Early accounts of the orders contained equally troubling elements. Reuters reported that “in 2023, Federal Bureau of Investigation She recorded a phone call between Wiles and her attorney, according to two FBI officials. Wiles’ attorney was aware that the call was being recorded and approved of it, but Susie Wiles was not.

It is surprising to hear of an attorney agreeing to the FBI recording an incident Lawyer and client conversation As a general matter. However, recording such a call without informing the customer would be a breathtaking invasion of protected communications.

Key points from Jack Smith’s testimony before the House Judiciary Committee

There is a lot we still don’t know.

On the face of it, these orders appear consistent with the previous allegedly abusive demands. Smith had virtually no basis for targeting Republican members and Trump allies. It was a hunting expedition in which Smith compiled lists of every known ally of the president Donald Trump.

There are also concerns about the response to this controversy. There are reports about 10 FBI employees fired. Agents often carry out orders from their superiors in such investigations. The administration must assure the public that these agents were given due process before being fired for their role in executing the orders.

AT&T gave personal cellphone records to then-House McCarthy spokesman Jack Smith amid the J6 investigation

Recently uncovered files from these investigations are an indictment of Smith himself. He received a historic mandate to investigate a former president. Instead of exercising a modicum of restraint to show the public that this was not a partisan effort, Smith gave in to his worst temptations to… Targeting a long list of Republicans.

In his earlier testimony, Smith offered little to justify these orders, except to quip that such secret orders occurred routinely. However, it was targeting “personality names” of top political opponents of President Biden and Democrats.

To make matters worse, Smith struggled to get damaging information published — and even set a trial date — on the eve of the attack Presidential elections 2024. Smith’s every action amplified the perception that he was seeking to influence the election. He has become a prosecutor consumed by his hostility toward Trump and his unfettered power.

Nothing was sacred to Smith. His investigation demands from the courts included a sweeping attack on the principles of freedom of expression.

Click here for more Fox News opinions

Ultimately, these files represent an indictment not only of Jack Smith, but also of former Attorney General Merrick Garland, who failed to exercise his authority to supervise Smith and protect basic constitutional values.

It is imperative that Congress and the Trump administration do so Fully investigate Smith’s probation requirements. Smith has long demanded accountability from others while evading such accountability for his own actions.

Click here to download the FOX NEWS app

If the previous orders are any indication, it is likely that Patel and Wells’ orders were based on sweeping generalities and demands of absolute secrecy. This is Jack Smith’s signature. Indeed, Smith appears to have repeated his increasingly disreputable record, with the collapse of two high-profile cases and lingering questions about his judgment and actions.

He once again succumbed to his temptations, and the public paid the price.

Related article