Heritage report urges US to triple nuclear warheads by 2050

First on the fox: A new report warns that the US Nuclear Arsenal from the forefront and very small so that it does not face increasing global threats – and is recommended by three times three times the number of warheads that were published by 2050.

The report, which was first obtained by Fox News Digital, argues that the current American power, which is about 1750 nuclear weapons, has left the nation at risk in an era when Moscow, Beijing and Pyongyang expanded its acres quickly.

China alone building 100 new nuclear weapons per yearAccording to the Pentagon, it is on the right path to reach strategic parity with the United States by mid 2000.

“The latest warhead was built in 1989,” Robert Peters, the author of the heritage report, told Fox News Digital.

How should we respond after China rejects Trump’s nuclear talks, and shows new weapons at the show

The Russian army launches an Incontinental ballistic missile during training at an airport in Russia (Russian Ministry of Defense press service via AP, file)

“The size of the strength we have now … This was a design of the power that appeared when President Obama was in office in 2010, and the assumptions in 2010 were that there would be no real competition between the United States and Russia, and China was not a real player in the nuclear field.”

The report, designed by Robert Peters from the Alison National Security Center, suggests that Washington expands its strength to nearly 4,625 nuclear weapons that were deployed operational by 2050.

This number will include about 3,500 strategic warheads-which are carried out by ICBMS, the ballistic missile submarines, and the dies-and 1,125 non-strategic weapons, such as gravitational bombs and the theater’s range.

It comes amid warnings that Moscow maintains thousands of non -strategic nuclear weapons in Europe, as the number of American stocks exceeded up to ten to one, while China is racing to spread a surreptitious launcher, submarine -based missiles, and even tropical strike systems. North Korea already has about 90 warheads and continues to test the missiles that can reach the American homeland.

“We have a arsenal today exceeding decades of its planned life cycle, and building a force designed for a very benign world.”

The growing nuclear arsenal in China aims to break our alliances and control Asia, as it warns reports

The PEERS proposal is a modern power including the new Sentinel ICBMS, the first-class ballistic missile submarines, the dawn B-21, the long-range cruise missiles, and the non-audio theater weapons. The plan will continue to keep the American forces less than the levels of the Cold War, but it is much higher than today’s position.

It sets a plan for regional nuclear allocations in each theater, with the largest number of assets, and 3200 warheads, which are placed under the leadership of the North and focus on defending the country. About 750 warheads will be placed in Europe and 675 in the India and Pacific region.

Sentinel ICBMs calls for the minuteman III, B-21 and B-52 with long-range cruise missiles.

During the Cold War, the United States presented tens of thousands of warheads that were deployed in Europe, Asia and at home. The new 2050 arsenal will remain much smaller than the Cold War levels.

“The American president, who has some regional nuclear options, but only will face the ability to reduce wet damage during a limited nuclear conflict with two unusual options: surrender or threatening widespread attacks on the numerical homeland, and thus an unlimited response call, and this means suicide,” baffles the report.

The skeptics often ask why countries need thousands of nuclear weapons when one warhead can settle the city. Peters argues that this is a wrong concept rooted in the pictures of the Cold War from the mushroom clouds over Manhattan.

North Korea has about 90 nuclear warheads. (KCNA via Reuters)

In fact, most modern nuclear warheads were not designed for “breach of the city” but for the amazing-enemy nuclear nuclear forces, missile fields, and driving and control centers. China, for example, adopts up to 500 ICBM Silos in remote deserts. Military planners assume that it may take at least two US warheads to ensure the destruction of each site.

Peters said, “The goal never reaches this point. For this reason you have nuclear weapons, to ensure that you never reach this point,” Peters said.

It is not clear whether the current political leadership will respond to Peters’s recommendations. President Donald Trump suggested “nuclear disarmament” with the opponents of the United States.

“It is understood that Trump does not like nuclear weapons,” Peters said.

However, he added, “We tried [denuclearizing] During the era of President Obama in 2009 and 2012, no one followed. “

“Huge amounts of money are spent on nuclear weapons, and destructive ability is something we do not want to talk about today, because you do not want to hear it,” Trump hopes notes on the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, in February.

“I want to see whether we can disarm nuclear, and I think it is very possible,” he suggested talks about the issue between the United States, Russia and China.

president Vladimir Putin Russia has announced that it will suspend its participation in the new Start Treaty in 2023 on American support for Ukraine. Russia has often been arrested violating the conditions of the deal. But China has never participated in negotiations with the United States on weapons reducing.

North Korea rejected any proposal to devoted nuclear weapons from the United States

Read the report below. Applicants: Click here

In September, Russia has proposed one -year extension of the Start New Treaty, which is technically expired in 2026, but the White House has not yet responded to this proposal.

An expansion of the arsenal will not be cheap. But about $ 56 billion, the United States spends only about seven percent of the defense budget on nuclear weapons, says Peters.

The report also calls for the spread of nuclear capabilities forward in Finland and Poland, a suggestion that is certainly peeled the Kremlin and will cut off the strike times from hours to minutes.

Click here to download the Fox News app

Nuclear weapons are currently hosted in Italy, Germany and the Netherlands, – – The rules chosen in the Cold War when they sat only 150 miles from the Soviet confrontation line. But the confrontation line in Russia has now moved 800 miles east.

He has a similar invitation to the possibility of setting nuclear capabilities South Korea. Washington periodically publishes nuclear submarines in South Korea and includes Seoul in nuclear planning operations in exchange for an agreement from Seoul to not develop its nuclear weapons.