Diddy jury deadlocked after rapper's defense played 'high stakes poker': legal expert

Sports

Diddy jury deadlocked after rapper's defense played 'high stakes poker': legal expert

2025-07-02 04:00:08

Sean “Didi” Combs Federal trial jurors were subjected to Tuesday, after they arrived in a verdict on four of the five charges against rapper.

Two months after the trial started, and about 14 hours in deliberations, jury, Judge Aaron Superman, told that they were unable to reach a unanimous decision on charges of blackmail.

The prosecution summoned more than 30 witnesses to the situation over seven weeks of certificate, while the Deedi Defense team settled without contacting any witnesses on their behalf – a step that is considered a “high -risk poker” by the former Federal Public Prosecutor and Fox News Terry Judy.

The Daidi jury reaches a partial judgment in sex trafficking, and the prosecution of extortion

“Usually, when the defense does not invite witnesses, the defendant is called a prisoner,” Judy explained. “I have said that my entire career. This is a great way to summon someone as a prisoner. The jury must give a reasonable doubt and simply say that the prosecution did not meet its burdens … Most of the jury do not really understand what this burden is.”

He added: “The jury must give a reason to doubt, and if you do not put a very important defense, everything you do is government witnesses through the examination, you will be a prisoner.”

Didi defense claims that he was unfairly targeted, while the prosecution says that the rapper believes that he “cannot be prejudiced”

Didi told the court last week that his decision not to testify in the case of sex crimes. The judge asked whether Didi had understood that he had the right to testify or not, and if he discussed his rights with his lawyer. Didi replied, “Yes, accurately,” before admitting that it is “my decision only” that there is no testimony in the trial of sex crimes.

The jury started trading On Monday, June 30, and among the five charges, he could not agree on a judgment on the charge of extortion, one of the most dangerous charges against the disgraceful music pole. RICO’s Federal Violation can lead to a 20 -year prison sentence. It can carry the means of transportation to engage in the charge of prostitution, a penalty of up to 10 years, while sex trafficking Power, fraud or coercion He may carry a 20 -year prison sentence.

Judy said: “It is very complicated – most lawyers cannot explain Rico, so they expect 12 people, ordinary citizens jury to understand a criminal institution, who act actions … It is a great thing to ask,” Judy said. “There is a reason to ship it even if it does not win. It opens the proof doors that may be closed, so the prosecutors often will submit something because it enables you to obtain additional evidence in front of the jury even though you don’t really expect a guilty ruling in this number.”

Like what you read? Click here for more entertainment news

Criminal defense lawyer John W daySanta Fe, the practice of law in New Mexico John is the day of lawTell Fox News Digital that jury may have had difficulty understanding Rico.

“Was Deedy High Aviation and may disturb the lifestyle, or can you really choose a criminal institution equivalent to the family of organized crime?” He said today. “But tomorrow morning, the judge hopes that after a night of thinking about it, jury will have second ideas about a ruling divided into Rico – in one way or another – and they are unanimously returning to that more dangerous charge.”

Criminal defense lawyer Nicole Blanc Baker, Who is like R. Kelly, explained that the actions assigned against Didi were “building blocks” to create Rico’s charge. Whether the jury can agree on a ruling or not to see.

Baker said: “So what is happening is now forced to return there, and there may be a lot of frustration there, and more fighting is back and forth.” “What I understand is that the jury blade was somewhat something that they are at a stage where there are opinions that cannot be overcome on both sides. It is clear that some jury think,” Well, it is clear that it is guilty. “

The judge ordered the jury to continue trading at the present time. The second option is to give the additional jury instructions. Finally, the jury can return a partial judgment. However, Judge Subramanian said he was not thinking about the third option at this stage, and he chose to get part of the re -reading of the jury.

Criminal defense lawyer Eric FadisThe establishment partner of Colorado headquarters Varner FadisAnd he agreed that Rico’s charge was the most complex of all charges.

Click here to register in the entertainment newsletter

“The jury can be suspended on the various requirements of the charge, including the criminal institution,” said Fadis. “I think this may be a corresponding point because the government did not care about any conspirators and never invited any other alleged members in this criminal institution.”

Witness: Public Prosecutors accused Didi of managing a “criminal institution”

He added: “At this stage, it is not clear whether the partial judgment may lead to any reasons for appeal.”

In their argument, the government emphasized this Didi managed an alleged criminal institution With full control. The prosecution indicated that the jury heard the certificate, saw texts, watched banking records and heard a voice claiming to show the rapper “last night” committing a crime after decades.

According to propaganda, the government showed that Didi did not take any answer. “Until today, Didi managed to escape the crime due to money and power,” said American lawyer Christine Slavic. “That’s now.”

The ruling on the four accusations that were reached “somewhat quickly”, according to the Austin Criminal Defense Attorney. Sam Basit.

“It seems that the jury had struggled and spent most of their time discussing the most dangerous and complex blackmail.” “If you are the defense, I will be worried, but you never know what the jury will do. For this long trial, trading is for 13 hours on the short side of expectations.”

When the jury returned to the courtroom, the judge asked them to continue to circulate, saying that it was their duty to discuss with each other and form opinions.

Judge Supramian said that jury must reach a unanimous judgment, but he should not only give up their convictions to re -judge or satisfy the rest of the jury. Then the jury was rejected to the jury room. The court ended after 5 pm, and he asked the jury to return on Wednesday before 9 am

Lawyer David S. said. “Both sides mentioned that they do not want to accept a partial judgment,” Celzer for Fox News Digital. “This forces the jury to issue a full ruling, which may eventually lead to a jury suspended in the number if they cannot issue a ruling on all charges, and thus lead to a possible re -trial on the number of the commentator.

“With regard to appeal problems, there will be a lot, and depending on how to solve the case, this may be another appeal problem.”

[og_img]

Post Comment