Clapper allegedly pushed to 'compromise' 'normal' steps to rush 2017 ICA, despite concerns from NSA director
2025-08-13 19:27:22
Exclusive: The former director of the National Intelligence James Claper ordered the official to “waive” natural “procedures” to apply 2017 Evaluation of the Intelligence Society Despite the concerns of the director of national security secretaries, Mike Rogers, who claimed that his team had no “sufficient time” to review intelligence to be “completely confident” that Russia was involved in the 2016 elections.
Director of National Intelligence Tolsi Gabbard Email messages that were raised on Wednesday. Fox News Digital got video records.
“The leading numbers in Russia’s trick spent years in deceiving the American public by providing its manufactured and politicized assessments as reliable intelligence,” Gabbard told Fox News Digital. “The e -mail that was released today enhances what we have already exposed: the decision to waive the standards and violate protocols in creating the 2017 manufactured intelligence evaluation was intentional and came from the summit.”
“Clapper’s special words confirm that compliance with the manufacturing order was” collective sport “, as Gabbard claimed.
In July, the Fox News Digital stated exclusively that Gabbard and intelligence officials said that the Obama administration claims it “is making and politicizing intelligence” To create the narration that Russia was trying to influence the 2016 presidential elections, despite information from the intelligence community, which shows otherwise.
The email, obtained by the Fox News Digital Wednesday, was sent from Rogers to the then -then -party co -Clapper, then CIA manager John Brennan, and then FBI director James Kumi December 22, 2016, at 7:00 am, at 7:00 am, 7:00 am, at 7:00 am, at 7:00 am, at 7:00 am, at 7:00 am
“I just returned from TDY abroad and has been updated to the current situation of our efforts to produce a common product related to Russian support and the intention of penetrating DNC/DCCC,” Rogers wrote, and Rogers wrote in the email, “Rogers wrote in the email. “I know this activity is on a quick path and that people are working hard to collect a product that can be provided to the president.”
“However, I wanted to contact you directly to inform you about some of the fears I have with what I hear from my family,” Follow the email. “Specifically, I asked my team if they had sufficient access to the basic intelligence and time to review that intelligence.”
Soros’s alleged relations with Russia exposed in a flexible report of Durham’s report
“In both points, two fears raised fears,” Rogers wrote. “It was clear that at the level of employees, people were tending forward and trying to make sure that we have an opportunity to review and weigh, but I am concerned, given the miracle nature of this activity, my families are not completely comfortable to say that they have enough time to review all intelligence to be completely confident in their assessments.”
Rogers explained, as the email stated that “he does not say that we do not differ fundamentally, but I want to make sure that when we ask in the future if we can stand behind the paper at all, we have no reason to hesitate because of the operation.”
“I know that you agree that this is something we need to be 100 % comfortable before we offer it to the president – we have one opportunity to get this correctly, and it is important to do that,” Rogers wrote. “If the intention is to create an integrated product, CIA/FBI/NSA, it has been jointly composed that we can all defense, we need a process that allows us all to be comfortable, and I am concerned about our absence yet.”
Follow the email: “In addition, if NSA aims to be a co -author of this product, I personally expect to see even the most sensitive evidence of conclusion.”
“The intention is to create a CIA product only or the Central Intelligence Agency/FBI/FBI, I will deal with these concerns.”
“I welcome your ideas about these points and any modifications we might make on the process to ensure that we all have the necessary level of confidence in the final evaluation,” continued.
Hours later, at 7:43 pm on the same day, it was claimed that Clapper answered a Rogers email, and Brennan and Comey’s copies.
“I understand your anxiety.” “It is necessary to be (CIA/NSA/FBI/ODNI) on the same page, and we all support the report – at the highest traditions.” This is our story, and we adhere to it. “
FBI launches John Brennan’s criminal investigations, James Kumi: Ministry of Justice sources
“This evening, the Central Intelligence Agency provided the full draft resulting from the designated integration cell,” Follow the email.
“The designated integration cell” is the small team that Brennan collected to formulate the 2017 intelligence community evaluation.
“We will facilitate the largest possible amount of mutual transparency with the completion of the report, but more time is not negotiable,” Klbber wrote. “We may have to settle on our” regular “methods, where we must do this on such a compressed schedule.”
Email was distinguished: “This is one project that should be a group sport.”
ICA 2017 ultimately evaluated that “Russia was responsible for data leakage from DNC and DCCC,” but an official mark has been developed on Fox News Digital that ICA “failed to mention that the FBI and NSA previously expressed confidence in this chain of transmission.”
The documents revealed that in the months before the November 2016 elections, the intelligence community has been constantly that Russia “may not try … to influence the elections using electronic means.”
Weeks before sending emails, on December 7, 2016, Clappper’s conversation points said: “Foreigner enemies did not use electronic attacks on the election infrastructure to change the outcome of the US presidential election.”
In July, Fox News Digital obtained a photo version of the daily presidential course, which was prepared by the Ministry of Internal Security, with reports from the CIA, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the FBI, the National Security Agency, the Ministry of Internal Security, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and the open sources, to the president at the time Barack ObamaDecember 8, 2016.
“We are evaluating that the Russian and criminal actors did not affect the results of the recent US elections by conducting harmful electronic activities against the election infrastructure,” and mentioned the daily presidency. “The actors of the Russian government are likely to have been exposed to the voter registration database in Illinois and trying to do so in vain in the other states.”
But the summary stated that it is unlikely that the “effort” is unlikely to change the result of the official vote of any country.
“Criminal activity also failed to reach the scale and the necessary development to change the election results,” he said.
The summary indicated that the office of the National Intelligence Director assessed that any Russian activities “may have been aimed at causing psychological effects, such as undermining the credibility of the electoral process and candidates.”
The Federal Investigation Office had fears that this information was included in the presidential daily summary.
By December 9, 2016, a meeting was held in the White House room, with the topic line start: “A summary of the conclusions of the computer meeting on a sensitive topic (revision.)”
The meeting included senior National Security Council officials, Claper, and then director of CIA John Brennan, then national security advisor, Susan Rice, then Foreign Minister John Kerry, then lawyer, Loreita Lynch, then director of the FBI Andrew Mcabi, from among others, to discuss Russia.
“The schools agreed to recommend with the punishment for some members of the Russian military intelligence and foreign intelligence chains of the leadership responsible for cyber operations as a reaction to the cyber activity that tries to influence pre -activities if this activity fulfills the requirements” from the executive system that demands the required paths for those in charge Property.
After the meeting, according to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the CEO of the Claper Company via e -mail sent the leaders of the intelligence community who are interested in the new evaluation in the intelligence community, “according to the President’s request,” which detailed “the tools used by Moscow and the measures it took to influence the election of 2016”.
“ODNI will lead this effort with the participation of the CIA, the FBI, the National Security Agency, and the DHS,” says the record.
Later, Obama officials claimed “they leaked false data to the media” on the pretext that “Russia has tried through the Internet to interfere in, if not the actual impact, on the election results.”
By January 6, 2017, a new assessment of the intelligence community was issued that, according to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, “it contradicts directly with the IC assessments that were held during the previous six months.”
The current Fox News Digital officials told that ICA is “politicized” because it “has previously suppressed intelligence and after the elections that show Russia showed the intention and the ability to penetrate the 2016 elections”.
The officials also said that she deceived the American public “by claiming that IC did not evaluate the” influence of “Russian activities”, when the intelligence community, “in fact assessed the influence.”
In July, Fox News Digital said exclusively that Kome and Brennan are under criminal investigation.
In early August, Public Prosecutor Pam Bondi directed her employees to act in criminal referral from Gabbard. The Ministry of Justice is now planning to open a major investigation into the jury in the alleged plot to connect Trump to Russia in the 2016 elections.
Fox News Digital communicate with Clapper to comment and have no response.
[og_img]
إرسال التعليق