Biden does rare interview with NY Times to quell autopen controversy, but critics rage over media framing
2025-07-17 12:00:20
New York Times The tense scrutiny on how to frame her interview with former President Joe Biden is framing for his controversial use of the White House.
After avoiding the times, Biden spoke to journalists in corresponding times throughout his presidency, he spoke with the paper correspondents in a ten -minute phone call regarding the increasing questions of President Donald Trump and the Republican Party’s legitimates about the legitimacy of Biden’s amnesty in the last days of his presidency, which was mostly recorded using Autopen.
The Times Print“Biden says he made the compassionate decisions that were registered with the autopsy.” Biden insisted that he “made every decision” alone and called Trump and other Republican critics “liars”. However, the Times contained in the thirty -second paragraph of the long story that “Biden” individually agreed to each name of the factional pardon that applies to large numbers of people, referring to the former president and his assistants.
“Instead, after an intense discussion of potential different criteria, [Biden] He was signed on the criteria he wanted to use to determine the convicts who would qualify to reduce the sentence, “as stated in the Times report.
The famous Times broke out with the White House Biden because of his refusal to give any interviews with journalists (Biden sat with the column writer at the Times David Brooks in May 2021). The newspaper issued a two continental statement 2024 calling for Biden for his lack of access to the media while he was in his post, describing it “with concern that President Biden has avoided actively and effectively questions from independent journalists during his term.”
The Dibao University press professor Jeffrey McClic suspected that Biden decided to resort to times to combat the controversy of the controversy because the paper is the “main agenda of the news agenda” and that other news outlets in the old media will follow its progress.
McAkal told Fox News digital. “It is clear that the founding media still feels that they are forced to treat Biden with children’s gloves.”
Tim Young, a journalist for strategic communications at the Heritage Corporation, believes that Biden spoke with the Times because it was a comfortable way to repel criticism.
“Biden finally sat with the New York Times because the White House was presented by the Republican Party at home and Control project To literally not know what the orders of amnesty or pardon have been signed. It is clear that the pressure was dependent on its former employees in what could have been an actual constitutional crisis – where the left liked to scream a lot – and the team “took it” to get this before the repercussions of construction started, “said Young Fox News Digitter.
Instead of repeating the president repeatedly to sign updated versions of official documents, his employee used a automated pilot to put Biden signature on the final version. The Chief of Staff of Biden Jeff Zintis was the person who gave final approval to use the automated pilot, at least in the cases of medical advisor Anthony Fushi and former head of the joint chiefs of staff General Mark Millie, noticing the Times in the depth of her report.
Newsbusters Managing Curtis Houce Fox News Digital said that the Times report was “embarrassing”.
“The article related to the interview should have been made by tearing it up by their editors. It is the crime of the main story structure to wait even Paragraph 32 To reveal Biden, he did not personally agree to some pardon and subsequent evidence in the 36 and 37 charts, the reader told everything you need to know about his motives, “Hawk added:” I took the Times Baiden in his speech, as well as the word his treatment, which is great enough to know it is something that the journalist should not do in power. “
Political commentator Mark Halbene has argued that times ignored the basic press standards by not including opinions of experts and Republicans on Biden’s allegations about his use of anatomy.
“If this shoe is on the other foot, I cannot believe that the New York Times had not gone and I got Adam Shiv’s reaction. There is no republican reaction to that story.” “There is no legal expert adapted in the story.”
Halbene added that he could not understand “as a press” why the Times abandoned experts and opposes opinions about Biden’s claims about the use of autopsy.
What is the autopsy? The signing device is at the heart of Trump’s attacks on Biden’s torment
Independent journalist Drew Holden has published a lengthy thread in X Tuesday that reprimands times “to repeat Biden’s claim that he made calls” and “buried acceptance that” did not “really”.
“The article ends with the revelation in which the head of the Biden team gave the final signature,” Holden wrote. “Looking at what the former supervisor lied, why should we trust in these reports of events?”
Holden continued to release other news methods, including ABC News, CBS News, Usa today, Rolling Stone, HuffPost, Yahoo News and The Daily Beast, to frame the Times.
Young launched a Times interview “Biden’s effort” to save the face while it could be another huge controversy “that comes out of his presidency.
“Just imagine that the president who was known to be unhealthy and mentally gone is so much that he would have to go out and cancel the data and evidence that he has no idea of what was indicating an autopsy on his behalf,” Young said.
The New York Times did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Click here to get the Fox News app
Andrea Margolis of Fox News Digitter, Diana Stansei and Mark Tamasco contributed to this report.
[og_img]
Post Comment