Murder of Etan Patz, one of first missing children on milk cartons, raises confession questions after reversal
2025-07-27 21:00:11
The man was imprisoned to kidnap him and kill a six -year -old boy in New York City Nearly 45 years ago, his conviction has been reversed.
64 -year -old Pedro Hernandez works for 25 years in prison after his conviction in 2017 From killing Eitan Patz in 1979.
Patz disappeared on the first day that allowed him to walk to the school bus station by himself on May 25, 1979. He was one of the first missing children to be photographed on Milk carton In the event that the national attention is drawn.
President Ronald Reagan announced later May 25, 1983, the first The National Women’s National Day On Patz.
On the morning of May 25, 1979, the first grade student was granted permission from his parents to walk alone to the bus station, which is located just a mass and a half away from where the family lived. His mother took him to the basement and watched him walking at a distance – unprecedented again.
At a time Patz disappearanceHernandez was working on a teenage store in the Manhattan neighborhood in the center of Manhattan for the child. He initially spoke with the authorities because she was abandoning the child, but he was not a suspect until the police received advice in 2012 that revealed that Hernandez had made statements about the killing of a child in New York, but he did not mention Patz by name.
Hernandez was arrested in 2012 and finally confessed to the crime after seven hours of interrogation, and the investigators told that he attracted Patz on the store’s basement with a promise to give him a soda. Once he entered, Hernandez said he strangled the child because “something just longs”, before Petz – which Hernandez said he was still alive – inside a box and left him next to a pile of garbage.
MENENDEZ BrOTHERS Bank on a new trial as a backup if BAROLE BID fails
However, Hernandez’s lawyers insisted that the confession was the result of mental illness that caused the misfortune of his imagination about reality. Lawyers also pointed to the very low intelligence rate in Hernandez.
“Several factors have contributed to his confession, including low intelligence, mental illness and increased proposal,” said Jonathan Albert, a psychotherapist and author of “Nation therapy”. “This makes someone more likely to guilty or manufacture details to meet perceived expectations.”
Albert did not treat any of the individuals involved in the case.
Hernandez initially was tried in the New York State Court – with the end of the first trial in his pusality from the jury in 2015 – before the appeal was transferred to the Federal Court.
At that time, prosecutors claimed that Hernandez was fake or Exaggeration in his illnessReferring to Hernandez, according to what was reported, he admitted crimes before the police read his rights and began recording his interview in 2012. He continued to repeat his confession at least twice while recording.
The recognition ultimately led to questions from jury during their nine days of deliberations, as their final investigation was about whether he was required to exclude the two registered confessions if they were determining that the first one was invalid – as the judge told them that they were not.
The Court of Appeal later ruled that the judge had to provide a better explanation for the jury in relation to their options, which could have included not being raised in Hernandez’s three confessions.
In reference to the jury’s memo during the trial, the Court of Appeal said that the judge provided a “clearly wrong” response and “clear harmful” to the question that was asked.
The court’s decision to persuade Hernandez and give him a new trial raises questions about mental health and recognition of court cases, as Albert refers to the repeated ability of individuals with mental health disorders that “they have an urgent need to obtain approval from the power numbers.”
“When investigators suggest a narration, these individuals can absorb and repeat them, not out of deception, but out of compliance. Over time, they may start believing this themselves, especially when they are under stress or fatigue.”
Although the new trial can bring an additional clarity to a state of decades, Aliert warns that it may also lead to misunderstanding regarding testimony and evidence after years.
“Re -trial has the ability to bring clarity, especially if new psychological visions or evidence are presented,” Albert told Fox News Digital. “But it can easily create more ambiguity, especially if the issue continues to rely heavily on interpretation rather than difficult facts.”
Get updates in the actual time directly on Real crime center
The case got the national attention, as the Patz image was one of the first to be circulated to milk cans throughout the country. His parents spent contracts in the same house and with the same phone number, hoping that their son will eventually return to them.
The child’s family worked to help create a missing national line for the child and a new way of law enforcement agencies throughout the country to distribute information related to these cases.
“They have waited and rewarded for 35 years for ETAN, which may be, unfortunately, have been lost,” Corus Vans Junior, a former Manhattan County lawyer, told Associated Press after hearing about reflection.
Click here to get the Fox News app
The court ordered the release of Hernandez unless he received a new trial during a “reasonable period of time”.
“For more than 13 years, Pedro Hernandez was in prison due to a crime he had not committed, and based on the condemnation that the second circle has now clarified in a clear violation of the law,” Harvey Vesphensin said in a statement. “We are grateful because the court has now gave Pedro an opportunity to restore his life, and we are calling the Public Prosecutor’s Office in Manhattan to drop these misleading charges and focus their efforts on the place they belong – to find those responsible for the disappearance of Eitan Pits.”
Manhattan County Lawyer’s office did not immediately respond to the Fox News Digital request for comment.
“This issue highlights a wider issue in the legal system,” Albert said. “The confessions are not always reliable. Mental, coercion, or despair can lead a person to confessing guilt falsely. Without material evidence to support recognition, the courts must move forward with great caution. Understanding psychology behind recognition is necessary before being treated as a fact.”
[og_img]
Post Comment