Brennan directed publication of 'implausible' reports claiming Putin preferred Trump in 2016, House found

Sports

Brennan directed publication of 'implausible' reports claiming Putin preferred Trump in 2016, House found

2025-07-23 12:09:29

First on the fox: Intelligence community He had no direct information This Russian President Vladimir Putin wanted to help in electing Donald Trump during the 2016 presidential election, but, in the “extraordinary” direction of President Barack Obama at the time, published “may be biased” or “unreasonable” that indicates otherwise, according to the House of Representatives Intelligence Committee.

Director of National Intelligence Tolsi Gabbard The secrecy was submitted by a report prepared by the Permanent Mukhtar Committee for the House of Representatives on Intelligence in 2020.

Obama officials admitted that they had no “experimental guide” on Trump’s complicity in Russia: Intel House copies

The report, which was based on an investigation launched by former intelligence community head Divin Nunes, R-Calif, was dated September 18, 2020. At the time of the publication of the report, Representative Adam Chef, the California, was the chairman of the committee.

The report has not been issued before the audience, instead, he remained very classified in the intelligence community.

Fox News Digital obtained a fully accessible, which was fully obtained, which has been formulated and stored in a limited cellar, arriving at the headquarters of the CIA.

The committee focused on establishing the 2017 intelligence community evaluation, which John Brennan, then the director of CIA, prompted to include now approved anti -Trump file, although it was known that he was largely dependent on “Internet rumors”, previously reported by Fox News Digital.

According to the report, ICA was “a high -level producer that the president requested, directed by IC’s heads, and was created by only five analysts, using one major formulation.”

“ICA’s production was subject to unusual directives from the president and the senior political appointed, especially DCIA,” the report states. “The draft has not been correctly coordinated within the CIA or IC, ensuring its publication without great challenges to its conclusions.”

The committee found that the five analysts of the CIA and ignored them “rushed” ICA production “for publication two weeks before the President -elect Trump will reside.”

The report states: “Rapid coordination and limited access to the draft opportunities available for IC to discover compensation for sources and other concerns related to trade.”

Flashback: Intel House versions show that senior Obama officials have no “experimental guide” on Trump’s complicity in Russia

The report states that Brennan “ordered post-election deployment of 15 reports that contain intelligence that has been collected in advance but unpublished, three of which are below the required level-which contains unclear information, out of uncertainty, which is likely to be biased, or unreasonable-became the basic sources of ICA rulings that Putin Trump prefers Clinton.”

Read the report – App users, click here:

The committee found: “ICA has been distorted as reliable, without mentioning its important basic faults.”

“It constitutes a small, unclear and incapable part of the sentence from one of the sub-level reports that the only classified information mentioned for Putin’s proposal” aspiring “to help Trump to win,” the report also states that ICA “has ignored or selectively conveyed reliably reliable intelligence reports that were reduced in some cases-the ruling that Putin chosen attended.”

The report also states that ICA “failed to consider the reasonable alternative interpretations of Putin’s intentions referred to by reliable intelligence and observation Russian actions.”

The committee also found that two senior CIA officers warned Brennan that “we have no direct information that Putin wanted to elect Trump.”

Despite these warnings, the Obama administration has moved to publish ICA.

ICA “No report was martyred as Putin directly referred to Trump’s help was the goal.”

Obama denies “strange allegations” Trump that he was a “link” in a rare statement in a rare statement

According to the report, ICA ruled out “great intelligence” and “it was ignored or transmitted selectively” reliable intelligence in an attempt to push Russia.

The report also includes the intelligence of one of Putin’s close associates for a long time, explained to the investigators that “Putin told him that he does not care about the one who won the elections,” and that Putin “has often identified the weaknesses of both the main candidates.”

The report also states that the context showed by ICA shows that the claim that Putin is Trump’s favor was “unreasonable – if not ridiculous.”

The committee also found that ICA suppressed the intelligence that showed that Russia was actually planning to achieve Hillary Clinton’s victory because “they knew where [she] “Russia’s belief” could work with it.

The committee also noted that ICA “did not deal with why Putin chose not to leak more reputable materials on Clinton,” even as opinion polls are tightened in the last weeks of the elections. “

The committee also found that ICA suppressed the intelligence that showed that Putin was “not only indicating a clear lack of anxiety about Trump’s electoral fate,” but also indicated that he prefers that Minister Clinton sees elected, knowing that she will be a more vulnerable president. “

The process of removing salvation for the report comes a few days after the company was lifted from Gabbard and issued documents that included “overwhelming evidence” that showed how, after the president, after the president Donald Trump He won the 2016 elections against Hillary Clinton, then President Barack Obama, and his national security team, and laid the basis for what will be achieved by Trump-Russia for a period of years.

At the same time, Fox News Digital obtained, in 2020, specific texts of national security certificates from the Obama era before the Intelligence Committee in the House of Representatives, where these officials witnessed that they have no. “Experimental Guide” From a conspiracy between the Trump and Russia campaign in the 2016 elections, but it continued to pushing the “narration” of collusion in public.

In 2017, the Intelligence Committee in the House of Representatives conducted deposits from Obama’s top intelligence officials, Including National Intelligence Director James Clapper, National Security Adviser Susan Rice and the General Investigation Lyreta Lynch, among others.

The responses of officials in the texts of these interviews are in line with the results of the investigation of former Special Adviser Robert Muller – who has not found any evidence of criminal coordination between the Trump and Russia campaign in 2016, with no decision on obstruction of justice.

Obama Admin “manufacture” intelligence to create a narration that interferes in the 2016 Russian elections, and the documents show

The texts, from 2017 and 2018, revealed the interrogation of Obama’s senior officials by legislators and investigators of the Intelligence Committee in the House of Representatives about whether they had seen or saw evidence of this collusion, coordination or conspiracy – the case that pushed the first FBI case and beyond the investigation of the Special Adviser.

“I have never seen any direct experimental evidence that the Trump campaign or someone was conspiring/conspiring with the Russians to interfere in the elections. Clabber witnessed in 2017.

Lynch also said that she “don’t remember to know me.”

“I cannot say that it exists or not,” Lynch said, referring to evidence of collusion, conspiracy or coordination.

But Clapper and Linche, and Vice President Joe Biden, were present at the Oval Office on July 28, 2016, when Brennan Obama and Kumi briefed on the intelligence he received from one of them. Hillary Clinton The campaign’s foreign policy consultants “activating Donald Trump by provoking a scandal claiming to intervene by the Russian security service.”

“We get an additional look at the Russian activities from (Al -Munawakla),” Brennan’s handwritten observations, which Fox News Digital obtained in the exclusive in October 2020. “(Summarizing) was killed by Hillary Clinton, a proposal from one of its foreign policy consultants at Donald Trump’s appreciation by provoking a scandal claiming to intervene by the Russian security service.”

Obama officials used the expression file, and the shortcut of Trump, although he learned that he had not been verified “Internet rumors”

Meanwhile, the United Nations Ambassador to the United Nations, Samantha Power, was asked, according to the copy of its interview with the Intelligence Committee in the House of Representatives, whether she had seen or saw any evidence of collusion or conspiracy.

Power replied: “I am not in the possession of anything – I am not in his possession and I have not read or absorbed the information that came from the intelligence community.”

When I was asked again, she said, “I am not.”

The rice was asked the same question.

“I have the best of my memory, there was nothing smoking, but there were some things that gave me temporarily.” “I do not remember the intelligence that I will consider evidence of this meaning that I saw … a conspiracy before I leave.”

When asked if she had any evidence of “coordination”, Rice replied: “I don’t remember any intelligence or evidence in this sense.”

When asked about collusion, Rice replied: “The same answer.”

Former National Security Adviser Bin Rhodes was asked the same question during an intelligence interview.

Rhodes said: “I have not received any information about any criminal investigations or the anti -espionage in what the Trump campaign is doing, so I couldn’t see that information,” Rhodes said.

When he was pressed again, he said: “I have seen indications of potential coordination, but I did not see, as you know, the evidence specified on the actions of the Trump campaign.”

FBI launches John Brennan’s criminal investigations, James Kumi: Ministry of Justice sources

Meanwhile, this specific question has not been asked, but former deputy director of the FBI Andrew Maccabi on this specific question, but rather questions about the accuracy and legitimacy of an anti -Trump file not scheduled by former British intelligence officer Christopher Steel.

Maccabi was asked during his interview in 2017 what is “the most insignificant or important evidence in the file that he” now knows that it is true. “

Maccabi replied, “We could not prove the accuracy of all the information.”

“You don’t know if this is true or not?” A house investigator asked, Maccabi replied: “This is true.”

After Trump’s victory for 2016 and during the presidential transition period, Kumi Trump briefed on a famous anti -Trump anti -Trump file, which contains horrific allegations of the alleged coordination between Trump and the Russian government. Brennan was present to this briefing, which was held in Trump Tower in New York City in January 2017.

The file was composed by Steel. It was funded by the Clinton presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee through the Berkins Koy law company.

But Brennan Wumi was aware of the intelligence that during the campaign, during the campaign, Clinton was raising a plan to connect Trump to Russia, as the documents claim. It is not clear whether the intelligence community, at the time, knows that the file has paid for Clinton and DNC.

Brennan Wome is now under FBI criminal investigations Regarding their activities related to Russia’s probe, after sending a criminal referral by CIA director John Ratcliffe to the FBI director Cash Patel.

Flashback: I noticed the newly -made Intel Doss Dossary’s “limited confirmation” calls.

Gabbard also sent the criminal referrals of the Ministry of Justice to those who participate in the efforts made to create “manufactured” and “politicization” intelligence that led to the spread of Trump’s collusion with Russia.

Obama’s era officials were a mother of the new disclosure, but Obama’s spokesman on Tuesday made a rare public statement.

“In respect of the presidential office, our office usually does not honor the continuous nonsense and the wrong information that flows from this White House with a response,” Obama spokesman Patrick Rodbush said in a statement. “But these allegations are impressive enough to dispense with one.”

“These strange allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt in distraction.” “Nothing in the document issued last week undermines the acceptable conclusion on a large scale Russia She worked to influence the 2016 presidential elections, but she did not successfully manipulate any votes. “

He added: “These results were confirmed in the 2020 report by the Senate Intelligence Committee from the two parties, led by then President Marco Rubio.”

[og_img]

Post Comment