What are Trump’s options for dealing with Iran?

President Trump’s comments have deviated from the Israeli conflict of Iran from the full support of Israel’s strikes to clean itself from them and return again.

Ghomo added to the feeling of certainty as the fighting itself escalates.

Meanwhile, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the attacks are “fully coordinated” with the United States.

What are the factors that weigh Trump, decisively, what are his options now?

When Israeli missiles struck Tehran on Thursday, Trump threatened Iran’s leaders with the “most brutal” attacks from his Israeli armed ally with US bombs.

We know Trump’s final goal. He says, like Netanyahu, that Iran cannot have a nuclear bomb. It is important, that his favorite choice (unlike Netanyahu) is through a deal between the United States and Iran (this way also reflects his self -described image as a global deal maker).

But he assembled it on how to get there, and sometimes he tends to threaten power, and sometimes pay diplomacy. Last week, he said at the same time that an Israeli attack on Iran would help in an agreement or “will explode.”

Sometimes the inability to predict it is depicted by its supporters after a reality as a strategy – the so -called “Madman” theory of external relations. This theory is the one that was previously used to describe Trump’s negotiating tactics and indicates that deliberate uncertainty or the inability to predict the escalation work on differences (or even allies in the Trump case) to comply. He was attributed to some of the Cold War practices of President Richard Nixon.

Some of Trump’s advisers and their supporters return alongside the “maximum pressure” from the madness theory when it comes to his approach to Iran. They believe that the threats will eventually prevail because they are arguing, that Iran is not serious in negotiating (although the country in 2015 signed a nuclear deal led by Obama from which Trump withdrew later).

Netanyahu has applied constant pressure on Trump to go to the army, not on the diplomatic path, and the American president – despite his desire to win the Nobel Peace Prize – may eventually see a need to fulfill his more aggressive threats to lead Tehran

Israel may also push more powerful behind the scenes for American participation, as you see, to end the mission. The United States of the bombs in the Israeli Poster has to destroy the underground uranium enrichment site in Iran in Fordo.

With the escalation of fighting, the pressure on Trump from the camp of Republican falcons in Congress who long called for a change in the regime in Iran.

Trump will also see the argument that he could force the Iranians to negotiate with him with a weaker hand now. But the truth remains that the Iranians were already at that table, as what was planned to the sixth round of the talks with Trump Steve Wittouf’s envoy in Amman was planned on Sunday.

The conversations are now abandoned.

To date, Trump has repeated that the United States is not involved in Israel’s attacks.

The escalation comes with great risks and may determine a legacy of Trump. US marine destroyers and wild missile batteries already help in Israel’s defense against Iranian revenge.

Some Trump advisers to the National Security Council will probably warn against doing anything that can add to the severity of Israel’s attacks on Iran in direct days, especially with some Iranian missiles that penetrate Israeli defenses to the deadly influence.

Netanyahu is now arguing that the targeting of Iran’s supreme leader, Ali Khandini, will end, not escalation, conflict.

But an unknown American official informed some of the weekend news that Trump made it clear that he was against this step.

One of the great political factors playing in Trump’s minds is his home support.

Most Republicans in Congress still restore Israel strongly, including the continuous US weapons supplies to the country. Many have supported Israel’s attacks on Iran.

But there are major Trump voices that make America again (Maga), which now rejects this traditional “IronClad” support for Israel.

Over the past few days, they asked why the United States risks in the Middle East war, given Trump’s promise to Trump’s foreign policy.

Trump -Tucker Carlson journalist Written criticism Friday, saying that the administration’s demands not to participate were not correct, and that the United States should “drop Israel.”

Mr. Netanyahu suggested “and his thirsty government” was acting in a way that would withdraw from the American forces to fight on his behalf.

Carlson wrote: “The involvement in it will be an average finger in the faces of millions of voters who made their votes in the hope of creating a government that would put the United States first.”

Likewise, the pro -US representative of Trump Margori Taylor Green Posted on X This: “Anyone wandering in the United States to fully participate in the Israeli/Iran war is not America first/Maga.”

This is a great weakness for Trump.

It adds pressure to it to put a distance between the United States and the Israeli attack, and there are signs, at least, to respond to it.

Maga’s discussion coincided during the weekend with its publication on the social media that joined Russian President Putin in calling for an end to the war. By Sunday, he said that Iran and Israel should conclude a deal, adding: “The United States has nothing to do with the attack on Iran.”

Iran has already threatened to attack our bases in the region if it is, as it is happening now, Washington helps Israel’s defense.

It is likely that the danger of any American victims is likely to see that the Maga isolation argument is growing greatly, adding pressure on Trump to retreat and urged Mr. Netanyahu to bring the attack to the end of Swifter.