Abrego Garcia return to US prompts new questions for other immigrants deported by Trump
2025-06-09 17:38:14
the Trump administration On Friday, it announced that it returned to Kilmar Abrago Garcia-a Silvadori immigrant and the alleged MS-13 member-to the United States, months after he was deported to El Salvador, while officials admitted later, was an administrative mistake.
It is unclear whether Abrego Garcia refers to a transformation in politics or just once. The administration is close to announcing the news of a new federal indictment accusing it of crimes related to the transfer of immigrants who are not documented in the United States.
However, the case raised new questions about the administration’s willingness to comply with the orders of other courts that require the return of migrants who have been deported-whether it is individuals or entire categories-or imposes that some individuals in the American nursery for a sufficient period to challenge their removal operations to the so-called “third countries”.
It also undermines the Trump administration’s assertion earlier this year that it is not strong to order El Salvador to return a prisoner or facilitate the return of migrants who were sent to El Salvador – which the judges have tried somewhat in vain to the various court procedures this year.
Here is what to know about these cases so far.
Daniel Luzano-Gamarto, who was previously referred to in the court documents as “Christian”, is a 20-year-old Venezuelan immigrant who was deported in March under the law of foreign enemies, a wartime law in 1798 that Trump called to remove hundreds of migrants quickly and send to Salvador in the country to be arrested in the maximum security rule.
American boycott judge Stephanie Gallaghar Ruling April His deportation violated a settlement agreement stating that the Ministry of Internal Security (DHS) suspended last year with a group of young asylum seekers, including Lozano-Camargo, who entered the country as an unprocessed child and later sought asylum.
Under this agreement, the Ministry of National Security agreed not to deport migrants until their asylum cases were completely decided in the court, which it said had not occurred in the case of Lausano Camarago before removing it.
Gallaghar, who was appointed by Trump, spent his deportation was a violation of the contract. In order to return to the United States, she confirmed that her decision has nothing to do with the power of asylum in question-referring to a clear low-level drug crime that they were raising before his removal-but simply his ability to obtain a request for asylum in court under the agreement with DHS.
The American Court of Appeal for the Fourth District Hade this decision Late last month, cleans the road for Gallaghar to set an official timetable for the government to comply with the return. The officials of the National Security Ministry of the Court said last week in updating the situation that Luzano Camarago was still being held in Cecot.
The Trump administration returned to a Guatemali citizen who was mistakenly deported in the American soil last week, which represents the first known case of Trump administration Compliance with the orders of the judge to return an individual removed from the United States based on wrong information.
The immigrant, referred to in the court documents only called “OCG”, was deported to Mexico in March without the due legal procedures, and despite his declared fears of the country’s persecution, according to the American boycott judge, Brian Murphy, who ordered his return.
Murphy indicated that OCG was previously held for ransom He raped in Mexico But the opportunity was not given the opportunity to confirm these concerns before removing it – a right that gives it to us and an international law.
ICE officials told the court earlier this month that they were working to secure his return. Last week, OCG’s lawyers told Fox News that he had been returned to the United States on Wednesday over the commercial trip.
Unlike the individuals who were deported to Cecot, OCG was not detained in Mexico after being deported, which could have reduced some obstacles to the administration to return it.
Murphy has ordered the Trump administration to keep a group of six migrants who were deported to South Sudan without due procedures or notice so that they have the opportunity to conduct so -called “reasonable fear interviews”, or an opportunity to explain US officials any fear of persecution or torture, if they were released in the nursery of southern Sudanese.
Currently, all the six individuals are held at an American military base in Djibouti – the only American military base that currently operates in all Africa – and as ice officials assigned to keep them in the reservation have been martyred in recent health risks, including exposure from malaria, near heat, as well as nearby incendiary parties, in addition to the “imminent threat” of clown attacks from terrorist groups.
In response, Murphy Repeat earlier this month Individuals do not need to stay in South Sudan and that the United States is free to transfer them to another location, including a return to the United States, to implement these measures safely. It is unclear whether the government has plans to transfer the group.
Who is James Boasberg, the American judge at the Trump Deport efforts?
Last week, the American boycott judge James Basburg ordered the Trump administration to provide all non-citizens who were deported from the United States to Aqsa Security Prison in El Salvador to give the opportunity to search for relief in court in court and challenge their alleged position in a gang-which is the latest in a hot battle on Trump’s use of the foreign element in 1798 working to confront specific immigrants.
Boasberg repeated in the 69 -page ruling that legal procedures include providing migrants who have been deported to notify Cecot in advance for removal, as well as the so -called protection of appearances, or the right to challenge their removal operations in court. The Trump administration gave until Wednesday to present it to the court’s plans to provide relief from the ideal for the prosecutors who were held in CECOT.
“The defendants were clearly forbidden by these individuals of their right to seek relief from appearance before they are removed from the United States – a right that does not need heating through a petition to appear.”
Certainly, this provokes violent reactions from the Trump administration, which has previously erupted against the former provisions of Pasperg and the temporary restriction that was presented in March. Boasberg later found a possible reason for the administration’s contract in contempt for the court, pointing to the “deliberate disregard” of the government for its emergency order on March 15, which ordered the administration to stop its deportation under the law of foreign enemies, and to return all aircraft immediately to the United States, which did not happen.
[og_img]
Post Comment